Internal scoring app

Before · emailed copies, typed in again
After · one app, one list
  • Senior leaders scored each other in emailed spreadsheets, and one person re-keyed every score.
  • I extended the firm's existing app so scores go in once, without breaking what it already did.
140+ reviewsin the first 2 days
57 reviewersand 30+ people evaluated
3 to 4 weeksof re-keying by hand, replaced
Explore this route
Choose who to review
Search by name
  • Person AComplete
  • Person B2 of 5 scored
  • Person CNot started
  • Person DNot started
  • Person ENot started
BackNext
Technical 2
Person BStep 3 of 5
  • Exceptional
  • Exceeds expectations
  • Meets expectations
  • Needs improvement
  • Unsatisfactory
1.7 Exceptional
BackNext
Summary
Person B5 of 5 scored
  • Leadership1.6Exceeds expectations
  • Technical 11.0Meets expectations
  • Technical 21.7Exceptional
  • Technical 30.5Needs improvement
  • Culture1.6Exceeds expectations
HomeReview next
  1. 1Choose who to review
  2. 2Score each criterion
  3. 3Check it, then review the next

Key decisions

  1. Built every request from the app's developer

    Six review sessions. They would support it after me.

  2. Scores go in only through the app

    No more copies to email or scores to re-key.

Every step (9)
  1. Scores lived in emailed spreadsheets
  2. Couldn't read the unpublished app
  3. Checked saved copies against every build step
  4. Built every request from the app's developer
  5. The score control kept confusing people
  6. List access showed everyone's rows
  7. Scores go in only through the app
  8. Launched with a walkthrough
  9. 140+ reviews in the first 2 days